1. Introduction
The ICMP Netmask Request Information Disclosure vulnerability affects systems that respond to ICMP_MASKREQ queries. This allows an attacker to discover network configuration details, potentially aiding in bypassing security filters. Systems running standard networking stacks are typically affected. This may lead to a low impact on confidentiality due to information disclosure, with no direct impact on integrity or availability.
2. Technical Explanation
The remote host answers ICMP_MASKREQ queries (type 17) and responds with its netmask. An attacker can send these queries to gather network topology information. This is a legacy feature that provides little benefit but reveals internal network details. The vulnerability is tracked as CVE-1999-0524, CWE-200.
- Root cause: The host responds to ICMP_MASKREQ packets by default.
- Exploit mechanism: An attacker sends an ICMP_MASKREQ packet and analyses the response for netmask information. For example, using `ping -I eth0 -t 17
` on a Linux system. - Scope: Affected platforms include systems running TCP/IP stacks that respond to ICMP type 17 requests.
3. Detection and Assessment
- Quick checks: Use `ping -I eth0 -t 17
` on Linux to check for responses. - Scanning: Nessus plugin ID 19864 can detect this vulnerability. This is an example only.
- Logs and evidence: Network captures will show ICMP type 17 replies from the target host.
ping -I eth0 -t 17 4. Solution / Remediation Steps
The following steps provide a precise way to fix this issue.
4.1 Preparation
- Backups are not usually needed for this change, but a network snapshot is recommended. No services need stopping.
- Dependencies: Ensure you have access to configure the firewall or networking stack. Roll back by reverting the firewall rules or re-enabling ICMP responses.
- Change window: This change can be made during normal business hours with minimal risk, but approval may be needed depending on your organisation’s policies.
4.2 Implementation
- Step 1: Configure the firewall to deny incoming ICMP packets of type 17.
- Step 2: Verify the configuration change.
4.3 Config or Code Example
Before
# No specific ICMP filtering configuredAfter
iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 17 -j DROP4.4 Security Practices Relevant to This Vulnerability
Several security practices can help prevent this issue.
- Practice 1: Least privilege – only allow necessary network traffic, reducing the attack surface.
- Practice 2: Secure defaults – configure systems with restrictive default settings and disable unnecessary features.
4.5 Automation (Optional)
#!/bin/bash
# This script adds an iptables rule to block ICMP type 17 packets.
iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 17 -j DROP
service iptables save # Or equivalent command for your distribution
5. Verification / Validation
Confirm the fix by checking that the host no longer responds to ICMP_MASKREQ queries.
- Post-fix check: Run `ping -I eth0 -t 17
` and confirm there is no response. - Re-test: Repeat the quick check from Section 3, confirming no responses are received.
- Smoke test: Ensure basic network connectivity (e.g., ping to a known good host) remains functional.
- Monitoring: Monitor firewall logs for dropped ICMP type 17 packets as an example of regression detection.
ping -I eth0 -t 17 6. Preventive Measures and Monitoring
Update security baselines to include this configuration.
- Baselines: Update your network security baseline or policy to explicitly deny ICMP type 17 requests.
- Pipelines: Consider using infrastructure-as-code tools to enforce firewall rules consistently across all systems.
- Asset and patch process: Review network configurations regularly as part of a vulnerability management program.
7. Risks, Side Effects, and Roll Back
Blocking ICMP type 17 packets should not cause service disruption.
- Roll back: Remove the iptables rule using `iptables -D INPUT -p icmp –icmp-type 17 -j DROP` and save the firewall configuration.
8. References and Resources
Link only to sources that match this exact vulnerability.
- Vendor advisory or bulletin: No specific vendor advisory is available for this generic issue.
- NVD or CVE entry: CVE-1999-0524
- Product or platform documentation relevant to the fix: Refer to your operating system’s firewall documentation for specific configuration instructions.