1. Introduction
An SSL certificate used in a malware-based command and control infrastructure was detected on your system, known as the APT1-Related SSL Certificate Detected vulnerability. This indicates a potential compromise of your system by the APT1 group. Affected systems are typically servers or virtual machines running services that utilise SSL/TLS certificates. A successful exploit could lead to data breaches, loss of confidentiality, and disruption of service.
2. Technical Explanation
The vulnerability occurs when a system uses an SSL certificate associated with APT1’s command and control infrastructure. APT1 utilises self-signed certificates for encrypted communications within their network. Detection of one of these certificates suggests the host may be communicating with, or is part of, their malicious infrastructure. There is no direct exploit path; detection indicates potential compromise.
- Root cause: The use of a certificate associated with known APT1 command and control servers.
- Exploit mechanism: While there’s no direct exploitation of the certificate itself, its presence suggests communication with an attacker-controlled server, potentially enabling malware installation or data exfiltration.
- Scope: Servers and virtual machines using SSL/TLS certificates are affected.
3. Detection and Assessment
Confirming whether a system is vulnerable involves checking the installed SSL certificates against known APT1 indicators. A quick check can be done by listing all certificates, followed by a more thorough review of certificate details.
- Quick checks: Use the following command to list installed certificates on Linux systems:
openssl s_client -showcerts <hostname>:443. On Windows, use the Certificate Manager (certmgr.msc) to view installed certificates. - Scanning: Nessus vulnerability ID 229f64ed and e1be6908 can be used as examples for detection.
- Logs and evidence: Review system logs for certificate installation events or connections to known malicious domains associated with APT1.
openssl s_client -showcerts <hostname>:4434. Solution / Remediation Steps
Remediating this vulnerability requires determining if the system is compromised, restoring from backups if necessary, and investigating your network for further signs of a breach.
4.1 Preparation
- Ensure you have known good backups available for restoration. A roll back plan involves restoring from these backups.
- Change windows may be needed depending on service criticality; approval from security or IT management may be required.
4.2 Implementation
- Step 1: Identify the certificate in question using the methods described in Section 3.
- Step 2: Determine how the certificate was installed and its purpose.
- Step 3: If the certificate’s origin is unknown or suspicious, isolate the system from the network.
- Step 4: Scan the system for malware using up-to-date antivirus/EDR software.
- Step 5: Restore from a known good backup if compromise is confirmed.
- Step 6: Investigate your network for other systems that may be communicating with the same malicious infrastructure.
4.3 Config or Code Example
Before
#Example - Certificate details showing an unknown issuer:
openssl x509 -in /path/to/certificate.pem -text -noout | grep Issuer
Issuer: C=US, ST=California, L=San Francisco, O=Unknown Authority, CN=Malicious Certificate
After
#Example - Certificate details showing a trusted issuer (after replacement):
openssl x509 -in /path/to/new_certificate.pem -text -noout | grep Issuer
Issuer: C=US, ST=California, L=San Francisco, O=Trusted Authority, CN=Valid Certificate
4.4 Security Practices Relevant to This Vulnerability
Several security practices can help prevent this type of issue. Least privilege reduces the impact if a system is compromised. Input validation helps block unsafe data and configurations. Patch cadence ensures systems are up-to-date with the latest security fixes.
- Practice 1: Implement least privilege to limit the potential damage from a compromised account or service.
- Practice 2: Regularly review SSL/TLS certificate usage and ensure only trusted certificates are installed.
4.5 Automation (Optional)
#Example - PowerShell script to list installed certificates:
Get-ChildItem Cert:LocalMachineMy | Where-Object {$_.Issuer -like "*Unknown Authority*"}
5. Verification / Validation
Confirming the fix involves verifying that the malicious certificate is removed and replaced with a trusted one. Re-run the earlier detection methods to confirm the issue is resolved, followed by a service smoke test.
- Post-fix check: Run
openssl s_client -showcerts <hostname>:443and verify that the output shows a trusted certificate issuer. - Re-test: Re-run the Nessus scan (ID 229f64ed) to confirm the vulnerability is no longer detected.
- Smoke test: Verify key services relying on SSL/TLS are functioning correctly, such as web access or email communication.
- Monitoring: Monitor system logs for certificate installation events and connections to known malicious domains.
openssl s_client -showcerts <hostname>:4436. Preventive Measures and Monitoring
Preventive measures include updating security baselines, adding checks in CI/CD pipelines, and implementing a sensible patch or config review cycle.
- Baselines: Update your security baseline to explicitly disallow the use of unknown or self-signed certificates.
- Asset and patch process: Implement a regular review cycle for SSL/TLS certificate usage, ensuring only trusted certificates are installed and renewed promptly.
7. Risks, Side Effects, and Roll Back
- Risk or side effect 2: Potential for downtime during certificate replacement. Mitigation: Schedule maintenance windows and communicate with stakeholders.
- Roll back: Restore the system from the known good backup taken prior to making any changes.
8. References and Resources
- Vendor advisory or bulletin: http://www.nessus.org/u?229f64ed
- NVD or CVE entry: Not applicable – this is an indicator-based detection, not a specific vulnerability with a CVE.
- Product or platform documentation relevant to the fix: Updated on October 26, 2025